|
|
| Welcome to the Truck & Bus Forums | |
 | A very warm welcome to truckandbusforum.com, a completely FREE online community for people worldwide with an interest in vintage and modern trucks and buses. Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more. Please feel free to join by clicking HERE. |
|
|||||||
 |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
#1
17th December 2008, 21:01
|
|||
|
|||
|
Green Corridor
|
|
#2
17th December 2008, 21:57
|
|||
|
|||
|
I'm not clear about the detail
25 metres is about 80 feet. The images appear to show a smaller and a larger container (both of which appear to be lifted together:- http://img.worldcarfans.com/2008/12/...-project_3.jpg - are they connected?) I believe that ISO containers are 20ft and 40ft modules. Are they suggesting that every vehicle combination should be a 20ft and 40ft container? It doesn't make sense to try and introduce a new 'standard' (considering the number of ISO containers in existence).
|
|
#3
18th December 2008, 09:07
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#4
6th February 2009, 10:21
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#5
6th February 2009, 18:04
|
|||
|
|||
|
Link not working:- http://www.denbytransport.co.uk/ecoLink.asp
|
|
#6
6th February 2009, 18:30
|
|||
|
|||
|
|
|
#7
6th February 2009, 18:40
|
|||
|
|||
|
http://www.denbytransport.co.uk/spec...link_animation
Makes some sense, although rear-loading facility for the front trailer would be better IMO.
|
|
#8
6th February 2009, 18:58
|
|||
|
|||
|
Can see the advantages.
Very suitable for these loads that 'cube out' long before maximum weight is reached.
|
|
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
