Truck & Bus Forum Truck & Bus Forum
16:14
Welcome to the Truck & Bus Forums
Welcome!A very warm welcome to truckandbusforum.com, a completely FREE online community for people worldwide with an interest in vintage and modern trucks and buses.

Click here to go to the forums home page and find out more.
Please feel free to join by clicking HERE.

Go Back   Truck & Bus Forum > Truck Forums > Drivers Discussion Forum
Home Register Gallery TV FAQ Community Calendar Today's Posts Search

Reply
 
Thread Tools
  #1  
Old 6th October 2010, 01:54
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 79
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
The downfall and demise of Leyland.

Further to some extracts about circumstances at Leyland in the Land train thread ( http://www.truckandbusforum.com/gall...age.php?i=7771 )
Quote:
August 13th 1981

New truck to boost Leyland exports
Bv Clifford Webb

More than 1,200 orders for a new truck, the Landmaster, were announced by Leyland Vehicles yesterday, when the model was unveiled for public view. Designed expressly for African, Asian and Middle East markets, the Landmaster is already in production at its Bathgate, West Lothian, plant but hopes of new jobs in this severely depressed area were quickly dashed by Mr Peter Capon, managing director of Leyland Trucks. He said that the backbone of the company was still its home market and with United Kingdom truck sales halved this year from 80,000 to an estimated 40,000, Leyland was fighting for survival. It had managed to hold its 17 per cent market share but that only amounted to some 7,000 trucks. The picture overseas was not much better because of the effects of inflation and the strong pound. A truck which Leyland and German and Japanese rivals sold in a major African market for £8,000 in December 1978 had seen remarkable changes since. The German price was now down by 13 per cent to £6,950, the Japanese down by 9 per cent to £7,282 while Leyland's price was up by 34 per cent to £10,741. In practice Leyland had not allowed this to happen but had cut its profit margins to the bone to try to stay competitive. In some cases it was selling at break-even prices to retain a market presence. This could not go on indefinitely. Against such a background, Mr Capon was unable to give any guarantees on job security or the future of factories. The 9-12 ton Landmaster is a smaller version of the 40-tons upwards Landtrain launched a year ago for sale in undeveloped countries. When it is in full production of 4,000 a year it will account for about 25 per cent of Bathgate's current sales, replacing the WF truck, first produced more than 25 years ago.
Bathgate production has been severely curtailed in the past 18 months and is now less than 50 per cent of its installed capacity of around 25,000 trucks a year.
Quote:
August 19th 1981

£50m truck loss puts BL in danger again
By Clifford Webb, Midlands Industrial Correspondent

Record losses of up to £50m in the first half of this year by BL's commercial vehicle companies are endangering the state-controlled motor group's recovery programme only seven months after it was submitted to the Government.
It was on the basis of commitments made then that BL received a further £990m of taxpayers money. In its submission to Sir Keith Joseph, Secretary of State for Industry, on January 26 BL said:
" The plan envisages diminished losses for BL as a whole in 1981 and 1982 and a return to profitability thereafter."
But next week the company is expected to reveal first half losses for the group as a whole of £270m compared with £181m for the same period last year. The continuing failure to stem losses is bound to lead to another onslaught by Tory backbench critics who want to see profitable parts, such as Land-Rover, sold off. The dire state of BL's finances supports the assertion by executives that the warning letter to 71000 car workers was not a negotiating ploy as claimed by union leaders. In the letters BL said:
" In our present financial state we have to consider very seriously whether we can afford to pay any increase at all this year."
Ironically it is the traditionally profitable truck and bus operation and not the much criticized cars side which is accelerating BL's losses. Sources in the industry suggested last night that car losses are being reduced in line with the company's business plan. This points to a half-year trading loss for cars of well below £100m. It lost £93.4m in the first half of last year and was then overtaken by falling market demand which increased its full-year losses to a disastrous £293m. Leyland Vehicles, the truck and bus subsidiary, converted a £9m profit in the first half last year to a £32m loss for the year as a whole. It is ahead of the car side in bringing new vehicles on to the market but has been devastated by a 50 per cent fall in United Kingdom demand for trucks over the past two years. This has seen the market plunge from 80,000 trucks in 1979 to 61,000 last year and a forecast 40,000 this year.
A price cutting war with European importers benefiting from favourable exchange rates has seen profit margins cut and in some cases disappear altogether. Union membership at official and shopfloor level is adamant that it will not modify its demand for a substantial wage increase to come into effect in November after three annual settlements below 6.8 per cent. Some shop stewards insisted yesterday that since the collapse nine months ago of the official BL negotiating machinery they were not surprised by the letter's contents. They regard it as an attempt to put public pressure on full-time officials from the 11 manual unions who will shortly be sitting down to negotiate with BL management.
Engineering union leaders reacted dispassionately yesterday to BL's letter (Donald Macintyre writes). Mr Kenneth Cure, the union's West Midlands executive member, will press local officials and senior shop stewards at a meeting in Birmingham tomorrow to back an an quantified claim for a
" substantial increase " rather than the demand for a 17 per cent rise being canvassed by the unofficial BL Cars combined shop stewards committee. Mr Cure said he saw the letter as no more than the first shot in the battle, part of the continuous process that both sides go in for.
taken from:- http://www.aronline.co.uk/forum/view...p?f=48&t=13643
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 6th October 2010, 01:54
G-CPTN G-CPTN is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Tynedale
Age: 79
Posts: 3,698
Images: 209
Here's a couple more:-
Quote:
February 19th 1982

Leyland strike ends in uproar

By Edward Townsend, Industrial Correspondent

Strikers at the Leyland truck factory in Lancashire are to return to work on Monday after a confused mass meeting yesterday at which the works convener at one stage declared the vote to be overwhelmingly in favour of continuing the stoppage.
The meeting ended in uproar when Mr Michael Coyne, the convener, announced the result. Many of the 7,500 strikers surged towards the Platform, claiming Mr Coyne ad misjudged the vote. He was booed and jeered for more than 30 minutes and some workers alleged that he had tried to force the company to close. Mr Coyne conceded afterwards that his verdict may have been 'a little exaggerated" and his decision was later reversed with an announcement that the vote was in favour of ending the strike. The final interpretation of the vote was welcomed by BL last night. It had said that continuance of the strike, over planned redundancies and restructuring of the commercial vehicle operation, would close the factories. Workers at the Bathgate plant in West Lothian, Scotland, are to meet today. As they went on strike in support of their Leyland colleagues, it is thought they might also vote to return to work. The BL board was standing by for an emergency meeting today and was expected to announce closures and possibly liquidation of the Leyland group if the strike votes went against the company's plans. Meanwhile, 1,500 strikers at the Chorley plant in Lancashire and 1,750 white collar staff have also agreed to resume work next week.
BL said that given a return to work vote at Bathgate
"all of us at Leyland Vehicles must press ahead without delay with the task of winning back lost customers ".
The mass meetings came after the breakdown of talks between the management and unions earlier this week, when the company rejected an alternative strategy which, it said, would cost £600m to implement over the next five years. Leyland has been losing £2m a week in recent months, largely because of a drop in demand for heavy trucks.
Quote:
July 21st 1982

Leyland Vehicles goes into the red after profits

By Clifford Webb,
Motoring Correspondent

BL, the state-controlled car group, blames government economic policies and a strong oil-supported pound for the rapid deterioration in the fortunes of its once prosperous Leyland Vehicles.
In two years the truck and bus subsidiary has gone from regular profits to £74m losses. The full effect of government policies was revealed yesterday by Mr Jim Mason, Product engineering director of Leyland Trucks at a technology seminar at Leyland's Lancashire head- quarters. He said:
"In addition to the declining level of demand for trucks in the United Kingdom market, the United Kingdom based manufacturers have suffered a 50 per cent worsening in international cost competitiveness since 1977. This is the result of the impact of the Government's economic policies and accelerating North Sea oil revenues on the international value of sterling combined with intrinsically higher rates of inflation in the United Kingdom."
He said this had put pressure on all the United Kingdom manufacturers margins and had resulted in loss of market share not only in Britain but in many traditional export markets as well. The effect had been to cut United Kingdom truck and bus production by 50 per cent between 1975 and 1981. He forecast that against a background of excess capacity chasing too few sales only a limited number of full-scale truck manufacturers would survive. In Europe only two groups, Daimler-Benz and Iveco, the Fiat-dominated grouping, had the 100,000 units a year volume necessary to support both a full product range and a high level of integrated manufacturing of components. Many truck makers were seeking safety in joint ventures and mergers. To date, Leyland Vehicles had remained isolated from this industry regrouping but it was now pressing ahead with collaborative deals on major component manufacturing. He did not rule out co-operation with Japanese manufacturers but only on components.
Leyland Vehicles is expected to announce shortly an agreement with the American-owned Cummins Corporation for joint production of a new family of diesel engines. This has led to renewed speculation that Leyland will phase out production of its own engines. But it will not be going empty-handed into engine collaboration deals. Mr Ian Williamson, chief engineer, advanced technology, said work under way at Leyland was aimed at the diesel engine of the future, the so- called adiabatic diesel model.
Quote:
August 13th 1982

BL to cut more Bathgate jobs

The British Leyland truck Factory in Bathgate, Lothian, which has announced 300 redundancies this month and next, said yesterday that a further total of about 200 workers would have to go before the end of the year. That would bring to 1,565 the number of redundancies in 1982.
taken from:- http://www.aronline.co.uk/forum/view...p?f=48&t=13675

There's (much) more here:- http://www.aronline.co.uk/forum/viewforum.php?f=48
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 6th October 2010, 03:48
coastie coastie is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Holyhead again.
Posts: 1,507
Images: 289
Send a message via Skype™ to coastie
I often go onto the AROnline site, I find it really interesting also, it's good to see prototypes of some of the cars I have owned or have just driven. Sometimes the prototypes are far better looking (the Hillman Avenger especially) than the completed article!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 6th October 2010, 09:26
Fazer9553's Avatar
Fazer9553 Fazer9553 is online now  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Singapore
Posts: 313
Images: 2766
Very depressing to read when you think what could have been....

Here's a piece on another British mess: draw your own conclusions...
http://www.mk-marketing.eu/e-Pamphle...enPamphlet.pdf
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks



Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is Off
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT +1. The time now is 16:14.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.