View Single Post
  #11  
Old 7th December 2013, 20:48
robertdavey6 robertdavey6 is offline  
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Hyde, Cheshire
Age: 65
Posts: 536
Ah. Theory failure, then. I did wonder if the last tram might have been 263. It did seem strange to number a new tram 264. That's what happened in Croydon. The 1st new tram followed on, numerically, from the last old tram.
Reply With Quote