![]() |
Coach driver arrested after M5 crash.
Quote:
More here:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17497711 |
These pictures suggest it was a bus, not a coach:- http://www.metro.co.uk/news/894101-m...nd-coach-smash
I heard a witness suggest that it was stationary in the carriageway (not the hard shoulder) with only hazard flashers, not fog-guard lamps. even though it was foggy. |
Quote:
|
Quote:
If they had appreciated the danger of the situation and deployed the Police immediately after the earlier 999 call they might have avoided the crash (or become involved in it!). Sounds like the bus 'failed to proceed' with the driver attempting to restart it whilst stationary in lane 1. Edited to add (from above):- Quote:
|
Question asked at my PCV test in 1986, "what would you do if your bus broke down in the middle lane of a motorway" Answer is "get help as soon as possible". I only got it correct as another driver was asked the same question on his test and failed. His answer was get your passengers off the bus to safety before a truck turned the rear of the bus into a garage. Not really sure what is right but it would seem bus driver doing it by the book. Accident occured 12 minutes after 999 call was logged, how many vehicles passed safely before the collision?
|
Just heard that the passengers were fruit pickers en-route to Evesham.
|
Truck driver dies:- http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17504353
|
R.I.P driver and condolances to his family and friends
|
Quote:
|
Quote:
|
I confess that when I saw the damage I was surprised that the truck driver had 'survived'.
There's not a lot of protection . . . I don't think any trucks have airbags? (not that it helps much if the survival space disappears). Take care those of you out there who are still driving heavies. |
Quote:
Can I add my condolences, to the family? |
The bus was a former Stagecoach service bus (No.20780) which had worn a promotional overall advert for "Laurel & Hardy" rather than Stagecoach corporate colours. As it had been a service bus, it was not fitted with seat belts.
Photos of the vehicle (pre-accident) can be seen at http://www.flickr.com/photos/emdjt42/3557774902/ Given the road conditions reported (fog with less than 100 metres visibility) and the report at 0612 that there was a vehicle blocking Lane 1, the Highways Agency should have switched the warning lights to channel traffic out of Lane 1 into Lanes 2 and 3 and should have despatched the Police and Traffic Officers to the scene as a broken down bus/coach full of people should be a major emergency. I would have thought that the bus driver should also have evacuated the passengers to a place of safety. Having said that, the FW truck must have hit the stationary bus at some speed given the distance the vehicle was projected (given that its' brakes were on). There are a lot of contributory elements to this tragic accident. My thoughts and condolences go to all of the next of kin and relatives. |
Quote:
|
|
What I don't understand it is, given that the bus was reported as being on the inside lane how did the wagon collide with it on that side and not the other way around? (Wagons nearside colliding with buses offside.)
|
Quote:
Another possibility is that he was foreign and more used to a LHD vehicle. In which case, I think the instinct would be to swerve left, rather than right/ I do know that F.W. do employ some Polish drivers but, I don't think we know if this was one of them. |
Quote:
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-17521889 |
Quote:
|
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 12:34. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2025, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.